Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e031951. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031951

Table 4.

Detail of results for AMSTAR 2 assessing

Included meta-analyses AMSTAR 2 checklist Overall assessment quality
No. 1 No. 2 No 3 No. 4 No. 5 No. 6 No. 7 No. 8 No. 9 No. 10 No. 11 No. 12 No. 13 No. 14 No. 15 No. 16
Xuan et al 13 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Mounika44 Yes No Yes Partial yes No No Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Xie et al 18 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Wang et al 58 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Xiao et al 14 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Dong and Hao75 Yes No Yes Partial yes No No Partial yes Partial yes No No No No Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Zhou et al 74 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Liu28 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Li et al 12 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Ma et al 42 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Liu et al 41 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Erőss et al 32 Yes Yes Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Low
Pasceri et al 47 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Liu et al 15 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Chen et al 48 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes No Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Saburi et al 43 Yes No Yes Partial yes No No Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Critically low
Yan et al 65 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Dong et al 76 Yes No No Yes No Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Wang et al 57 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Chen et al 16 Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Partial yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Upala et al 54 Yes Yes Yes Partial yes No Yes No Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Li et al 39 Yes No Yes Yes No No Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Wang et al 56 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Wijarnpreecha et al 62 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes No No Yes No Critically low
Cremonini et al 30 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Weck and Brenner11 Yes No No No No No Partial yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Zhou et al 73 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Shiota et al 10 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes No Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Jiang et al 37 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Ford et al 9 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Feng et al 33 Yes No Yes Partial yes No No Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Wu et al 17 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Wang et al 60 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Wang et al 59 Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Wijarnpreecha et al 63 Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Partial yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Cen et al 27 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Shah et al 49 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Wang et al 55 Yes No No Partial yes Yes Yes No Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Wang et al 61 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Yu et al 70 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Shindler-Itskovitch et al 51 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Shen et al 50 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Ng et al 45 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Zhan et al 72 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Zeng et al 71 Yes No Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Nweneka and Prentice46 Yes No Yes Partial yes No No Yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Xiong et al 64 Yes Yes Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Low
Su et al 52 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Li et al 40 Yes No Yes No Yes No Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Taye et al 53 Yes Yes Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Low
Hwang et al 36 Yes No No Partial yes Yes No Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Gu et al 34 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Yao et al 66 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Dou et al 31 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes No Yes Yes No No Critically low
Jørgensen et al 38 Yes No Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Critically low
Hou et al 67 Yes No Yes Partial yes No No Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Critically low
Hudak et al 35 Yes Yes Yes Partial yes No Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Chen et al 29 Yes Yes Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Critically low
Yong et al 68 Yes Yes Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Critically low
Yong et al 69 Yes Yes Yes Partial yes Yes Yes Partial yes Partial yes Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No Critically low

AMSTAR 2 checklists: No.1: Did the research questions and inclusion criteria for the review include the components of PICO? No.2: Did the report of the review contain an explicit statement that the review methods were established prior to the conduct of the review and did the report justify any significant deviations from the protocol? No. 3: Did the review authors explain their selection of the study designs for inclusion in the review? No. 4: Did the review authors use a comprehensive literature search strategy? No. 5: Did the review authors perform study selection in duplicate? No. 6: Did the review authors perform data extraction in duplicate? No. 7: Did the review authors provide a list of excluded studies and justify the exclusions? No. 8: Did the review authors describe the included studies in adequate detail? No. 9: Did the review authors use a satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies that were included in the review? No. 10: Did the review authors report on the sources of funding for the studies included in the review? No. 11: If meta-analysis was performed, did the review authors use appropriate methods for statistical combination of results? No. 12: If meta-analysis was performed, did the review authors assess the potential impact of RoB in individual studies on the results of the meta-analysis or other evidence synthesis? No. 13: Did the review authors account for RoB in primary studies when interpreting/discussing the results of the review? No. 14: Did the review authors provide a satisfactory explanation for, and discussion of, any heterogeneity observed in the results of the review? No. 15: If they performed quantitative synthesis, did the review authors carry out an adequate investigation of publication bias (small study bias) and discuss its likely impact on the results of the review? No. 16: Did the review authors report any potential sources of conflict of interest, including any funding they received for conducting the review?