. 2019 Nov 26;7(12):241. doi: 10.3390/sports7120241

Table 5.

Influence of the longest distance raced on potential doping prevalence. The standard error (SE) is provided. Post-hoc power analyses (Power) were performed to verify the results.

Variable (Longest Distance Raced over Last 12 Months)			Doping Prevalence ${\hat{π}}_{s}$ in % (Positive Answers after RRT)	SE ( ${\hat{π}}_{s}$ )	Power
None	Physical doping	n = 287	2.7	0.034	0.22
None	Cognitive doping	n = 298	15.2	0.038	1
Super-sprint or sprint	Physical doping	n = 550	6.9	0.026	0.88
Super-sprint or sprint	Cognitive doping	n = 567	11.4	0.027	1
Olympic distance	Physical doping	n = 475	9.3	0.029	0.96
Olympic distance	Cognitive doping	n = 494	9.8	0.028	0.98
Half-distance or long-distance	Physical doping	n = 491	7.6	0.028	0.9
Half-distance or long-distance	Cognitive doping	n = 509	3.5	0.026	0.42