Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 2;2020(1):CD013051. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013051.pub2
Study Reason for exclusion
Abbott 2016 POPULATION: not CSOM (acute otitis media without perforation)
Alper 2000 POPULATION: animal study (monkeys)
Baba 1980 INTERVENTION: comparison of antibiotics within same class and spectrum of activity (cefroxadine versus cephalexin); cefroxadine is a withdrawn drug
DURATION: only 6 days of follow‐up
Baba 1982b POPULATION: acute suppurative otitis media, including acute otitis media
Baba 1983 POPULATION: acute suppurative otitis media
Baba 1983b POPULATION: acute suppurative otitis media
Baba 1986 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (all patients received same treatment, aztreonam)
Baba 1987 POPULATION: acute suppurative otitis media
Baba 2008 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (all patients received the same intervention)
Berman 1990 POPULATION: middle ear effusion, not CSOM
Blekher 1967 INTERVENTION: not interventions of interest
Block 2000 POPULATION: not CSOM (acute otitis media without perforation of tympanic membrane)
Bluestone 2001 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (systematic review)
Boesorire 2000 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
Brook 1979 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT ‐ (alternative treatment) aminoglycosides only added when Gram‐negative organisms present in large numbers
Brook 1980 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (all patients received the same intervention, additional intervention only added based on bacteriological findings)
Bross Soriano 1996 POPULATION: AOM; patients with CSOM were excluded
Browning 1983 INTERVENTION: standard antibiotics were not given, the choice was dependent on cultures
Browning 1988 COMPARISON: variety of topical antibiotics + steroids (see CSOM‐4)
Clayton 1990 POPULATION: less than 20% had otorrhoea with "central perforation"; others were patients with otitis externa and mastoid cavity problems
Connolly 1997 INTERVENTION: compared method of administration, i.e. delivery system (spray versus drops) of neomycin‐dexamethasone
Couzos 2003 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
Crowther 1991 COMPARISON: topical antibiotic + variety of steroids (see CSOM‐4)
Deguchi 1985 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT
Deguchi 1986 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT
Deitmer 2002 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT
Dellamonica 1995 INTERVENTION: within‐class comparison (cephalosporin)
Dohar 2002 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (short review)
Eason 1986 COMPARISON: systemic antibiotics versus none (see CSOM‐2), antiseptics versus none (see CSOM‐5), aural toilet versus none (see CSOM‐7)
Esposito 1992 COMPARISON: topical versus systemic antibiotics (see CSOM‐3)
Esposito 2000 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (all patients had the same intervention ‐ ceftazidime)
Fliss 1990 COMPARISON: variety of systemic antibiotics (see CSOM‐2)
Fombeur 1994 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (no mention of randomisation); INTERVENTION: high‐dose versus low‐dose ciprofloxacin
Fraysse 1988 INTERVENTION: fenspiride (a bronchodilator/anti‐inflammatory agent) is not an intervention under investigation
Garcia‐Rodriguez 1993 POPULATION: mixture of patients, less than half had CSOM. Patients were not stratified by diagnosis
Gehanno 1997 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (all patients had the same intervention)
Gendeh 2001 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
Ghosh 2012 COMPARISON: variety of systemic antibiotics (see CSOM‐2)
Granath 2007 POPULATION: not CSOM (patients with recurrent AOM with discharge through tympanostomy tube)
Gupta 2015 COMPARISON: antibiotic versus antiseptic (see CSOM‐6)
Gyde 1981 POPULATION: less than 50% (27/68) had CSOM
Gyde 1982 POPULATION: less than 50% had CSOM
Harris 2016 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (systematic review)
Helmi 2000 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
Hemlin 1997 POPULATION: unilateral or bilateral secretory otitis media (COME); INTERVENTION: systemic corticosteroids
Hwang 2015 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (case control study)
I‐HEAR‐BETA COMPARISON: systemic antibiotic versus none (see CSOM‐2), topical antiseptic versus none (see CSOM‐5), topical antiseptic versus topical antibiotic (see CSOM‐6)
Indudharan 2005 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
ISRCTN12149720 INTERVENTION: antimicrobial peptide OP145
ISRCTN84220089 INTERVENTION: antimicrobial peptide OP145
ISRCTN86106121 INTERVENTION: not an intervention of interest to the review (oral zinc sulphate)
Jahn 1984 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT
Jang 2004 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (mentioned use of a "control group", no mention of randomisation)
Jaya 2003 COMPARISON: topical antibiotic versus topical antiseptic (see CSOM‐6)
Jiang 2016 INTERVENTION: comparison of 2 agents of the same class of antibiotics (erythromycin versus azithromycin) used in addition to a traditional Chinese medicine product
Kadar 2003 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT
Kashiwamura 2004 STUDY DESIGN: cohort (no comparison group); POPULATION: less than 50% with CSOM
Kenna 1986 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT ‐ cohort study (no comparison group)
Khanna 2000 INTERVENTION: culture sensitivity‐based prescribing
Khon 2012 POPULATION: not CSOM ‐ either diffuse otitis externa or acute otitis externa; STUDY DESIGN: no evidence of randomisation
Kiris 1998 COMAPRISON: daily aural toilet versus singular aural toilet (see CSOM‐7)
Kothari 1969 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (no comparison)
Kovacic 1999 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (compared ofloxacin in patients who had previous ear surgery versus no previous ear surgery)
Kurilin 1976 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (no mention of randomised controlled study design or control group included for comparison)
Lancaster 1999 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (cross‐sectional survey)
Lancaster 2003 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (compared compliance)
Lang 1992 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (case series)
Lautala 1983 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (case series)
Lazo Saenz 1999 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
Leach 2008 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
Legent 1994 COMPARSION: variety of systemic antibiotics (see CSOM‐2)
Li 2004 INTERVENTION: not an intervention of interest to the review (self‐prepared Chinese herbal medicine ear drops)
Loock 2012 COMPARISON: variety of topical antiseptics (see CSOM‐5), topical antibiotic versus topical antiseptic (see CSOM‐6)
Lorentzen 1978 POPULATION: AOM with intact or spontaneously erupted tympanic membrane; INTERVENTION: surgery
Macfadyen 2005 COMPARISON: topical antibiotic versus topical antiseptic (see CSOM‐6)
Manolidis 2004 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (review)
Mendelman 1992 POPULATION: acute suppurative otitis media (symptoms of 7 days or less)
Merifield 1993 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (case series)
Mesure 1973 POPULATION: in clinical trial part of study (part 2) only 1 case of chronic otitis media
Minja 2006 COMPARISON: systemic antibiotic versus none (see CSOM‐2) and topical antiseptic versus none (see CSOM‐5)
Miro 2000 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
Mora 2012 INTERVENTION: polyvalent bacterial lysate (antigens)
Morgon 1976 STUDY DESIGN: single‐arm study
NCT02592096 INTERVENTION: phase I dose finding trial ‐ compared different concentrations of pazufloxacin
NCT02817347 INTERVENTION: phase II trial ‐ compared different concentrations of piperacillin against tazobactam plus dexamethasone
Nwokoye 2015 COMPARISON: variety of systemic antibiotics (see CSOM‐2)
Onali 2018 COMPARISON: systemic antibiotic versus none (see CSOM‐2)
Otwombe 2003 STUDY DESIGN: systematic review, not a RCT
Panchasara 2015 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
Papastavros 1989 COMPARISON: topical antiseptic versus none (see CSOM‐5)
Picozzi 1983 COMPARISON: topical antibiotic + steroid versus none (see CSOM‐4)
Picozzi 1984 COMPARISON: systemic metronidazole versus placebo in people who already had gentamicin plus hydrocortisone ear drops (see CSOM‐2)
Poliakova 1991 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT
Povedano 1995 COMPARISON: systemic versus topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐3)
Principi 1995 POPULATION: acute and recurrent otitis media
Quick 1973 POPULATION: not CSOM (included acute tonsillitis, acute pharyngitis, acute sinusitis, acute otitis media, chronic sinusitis and peritonsillar)
Quick 1975 POPULATION: not CSOM (only 6/145 patients had otitis media)
Renukananda 2014 COMPARISON: systemic antibiotics added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐2)
Rotimi 1990 COMPARISON: variety of systemic antibiotics (see CSOM‐2)
Saez‐Llorens 2005 POPULATION: AOM
Sanchez Gonzales 2001 COMPARISON: variety of systemic antibiotics (see CSOM‐2)
Shkil' 1964 INTERVENTION: no comparison of interest (antiseptic arms used a number of different agents ‐ unclear which)
Singhal 1992 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (no comparison group)
Smith 1996 COMPARISON: aural toilet versus no treatment (see CSOM‐7)
Somekh 2000 COMPARISON: variety of systemic antibiotics (see CSOM‐2)
Stenstrom 1991 POPULATION: acute otitis media, not CSOM
Subramaniam 2001 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
Sultan 2017 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT ‐ single intervention (oral levofloxacin) studied
Sumitsawan 1995 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT ‐ single intervention (ofloxacin drops) studied
Supiyaphun 1995 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (cohort ‐ all patients received same treatment)
Tachibana 1986 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (all patients received same treatment)
Thomsen 1976 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT; POPULATION: acute suppurative otitis media
Tong 1996 COMPARISON: steroids added onto topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐4)
van der Veen 2007 COMPARISON: systemic antibiotics versus none (see CSOM‐2)
van Dongen 2014 POPULATION: 1) inclusion of minimum 2 weeks (review defined exclusion of 6 weeks perioperatively); 2) max duration of otorrhoea was 1 week
van Hasselt 1998b COMPARISON: povidone iodine added in hydroxypropyl methylcellulose ear drops (see CSOM‐5)
Vishwakarma 2015 COMPARISON: topical antiseptic versus topical antibiotic (see CSOM‐6)
Wilde 1995 INTERVENTION: different ways of administering the same ear drops (ribbon gauze versus drops)
Wintermeyer 1997 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (cohort)
Wright 2009 STUDY DESIGN: not a RCT (review)
Xu 1999 INTERVENTION: not a comparison of interest ‐ antibiotics versus Chinese medicine
Yuen 1994 COMPARISON: systemic versus topical antibiotics (see CSOM‐3)

AOM: acute otitis media; CSOM: chronic suppurative otitis media; RCT: randomised controlled trial