Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 4;2013(6):CD004878. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004878.pub4

De Boeck 1997.

Methods Parallel design, 2‐arm
Single‐centre, conducted in Belgium (affiliation: University Hospital Leuven)
Participants Inpatients
Inclusion/exclusion criteria 
 Inclusion criteria: age < 24 months; detection of RSV; 1st episode of wheezing or shortness of breath; onset of illness within the previous 5 days; informed consent
 Exclusion criteria: heart, lung or immune disorder; premature infants born before 34 weeks
Participant characteristicsAll groups 
 Sample size: randomised (N): 32, analysed ‐ all trial outcomes (N): 29 (per protocol analysis was used)
GROUP 1 
 Sample size: randomised (N): NR, analysed ‐ all trial outcomes (N): 14
Age: 6.2 (median), 3.7 to 7.5 (IQR) months
 RSV status: all positive
 
 GROUP 2 
 Sample size: randomised (N): NR, analysed ‐ all trial outcomes (N): 15
Age: 7.1 (median), 4.4 to 8.9 (IQR)
 RSV status: all positive
Males, N (%): NR
 Atopic status: NR
Interventions GROUP 1 (with glucocorticoid) 
 Drug name: dexamethasone
 Dose: 0.6 mg/kg
 Mode of administration: IV
 Timing/duration: day 1, 2 doses of 0.6 mg/kg; days 2 and 3, 0.15 mg/kg
GROUP 2 
 Drug name: placebo (NR)
 Dose: NR
 Mode of administration: IV
 Timing/duration: day 1, 2 doses of 0.6 mg/kg; days 2 and 3, 0.15 mg/kg
Additional co‐interventions for all groups: salbutamol (0.5%); 0.25 mL, ipratropium bromide (0.025%), 0.5 mL; both aerosolised every 6 h; also reported use of antibiotics
 Protocolised use of bronchodilators with glucocorticoids: yes (salbutamol + ipratropium)
Outcomes Primary outcome/outcome used to calculate sample size 
 NR
Secondary outcomes 
 LOS; SaO2*; respiratory rate*; clinical scale modified from Tal et al ‐ 12‐point score; pulmonary function tests (minute ventilation, dynamic lung compliance, and airway resistance ‐ PEDS, MAS, Inc., Hatfield, Pa.) (before/after aerosol and day 3)
 *time points: every 12 hours until day 3
Funding NR
Notes Study did not report any study‐level subgroup analyses
This study contributed to the following comparisons in this review: steroid versus placebo
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "patients were randomised"; no further information provided
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Health care use ((re)admissions, LOS, return visits) Unclear risk "double‐blind"; no further information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Clinical parameters (severity scales, SpO2, respiratory and heart rate) Unclear risk "double‐blind"; no further information provided
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Pulmonary function Unclear risk "double‐blind"; no further information provided
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Health care use ((re)admissions, LOS, return visits) Unclear risk 3 participants did not complete the study and were not included in the analysis; no report of motives or arm to which they had been assigned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Clinical parameters (severity scales, SpO2, respiratory and heart rate) Unclear risk 3 participants did not complete the study and were not included in the analysis; no report of motives and arm to which they had been assigned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Pulmonary function Unclear risk 3 participants did not complete the study and were not included in the analysis; no report of motives and arm to which they had been assigned
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Not all time points were reported and some outcomes with reported results were not mentioned in methods
Other bias Unclear risk Few details on baseline characteristics
Overall risk of bias Unclear risk > 1 domain as unclear risk of bias