Ohtsuki 2017.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind trial, phase 2 Date of study: July 2013 ‐ December 2015 Location: Japan |
|
Participants |
Randomised: 254 participants Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dropouts and withdrawals
Apremilast 30 group (9), Apremilast 20 group (16), Placebo group (12)
|
|
Interventions |
Intervention: A. Apremilast (30 mg tablet twice a day for 68 weeks), n = 85 Control intervention: B. Apremilast (20 mg tablet twice a day for 68 weeks), n = 85 C. Placebo, n = 84 |
|
Outcomes |
At week 16 Primary outcome:
Secondary outcomes:
|
|
Notes | Funding Quote (p 883): "The authors received editorial support in the preparation of the manuscript from Kathy Covino, Ph.D., of Peloton Advantage, LLC, funded by Celgene Corporation. This study was funded by Celgene Corporation." Conflict of interest Quote (p 883): "Mamitaro Ohtsuki reports consultancy and speaker fees. Yukari Okubo reports consultancy fees. Shinichi Imafuku reports research funds, consultancy fees and speaker fees. Robert M. Day, Peng Chen, Rosemary Petric and Allan Maroli report stock or shares in Celgene Corporation and/or employment by Celgene Corporation. Osamu Nemoto has no relevant financial or personal relationships and no potential conflicts of interest to declare." |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote (p 874): "After the screening period, eligible patients began a 16‐week placebo‐controlled period and were randomized via a centralized interactive web response system or interactive voice response system (1:1:1) to placebo, apremilast 20 mg b.i.d. or apremilast 30 mg b.i.d." Comment: probably done |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote (p 874): "After the screening period, eligible patients began a 16‐week placebo‐controlled period and were randomized via a centralized interactive web response system or interactive voice response system (1:1:1) to placebo, apremilast 20 mg b.i.d. or apremilast 30 mg b.i.d." Comment: probably done |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 874): "This phase 2b multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study" Comment: probably done |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote (p 874): "This phase 2b multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study" Comment: probably done |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Dealing with missing data: Quote (p 874): "Efficacy and safety assessments were conducted for the modified intent‐to‐treat (mITT) population, which included all patients who were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication; patients not dispensed study medication were excluded from the mITT population... For the primary analysis of PASI‐75, missing values were accounted for using the last observation carried forward methodology; multiple sensitivity analyses (including nonresponder imputation [NRI]) were conducted for the primary end‐point" Randomised 254; analysed 254 |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Comment: the protocol for the study was available on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01988103) The prespecified outcomes and those mentioned in the Methods section appeared to have been reported. |