Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;2020(1):CD003232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003232.pub4

Summary of findings 7. Azathioprine versus methotrexate for maintenance therapy.

Azathioprine (AZA) versus methotrexate (MTX) for renal vasculitis for maintenance therapy
Patient or population: adults with renal vasculitis for maintenance therapy
 Settings: inpatients then outpatients
 Intervention: AZA
 Comparison: MTX
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No. of participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE)
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
MTX AZA
Death 16 per 1000 5 per 1000
(0 to 127)
RR 0.33
(0.01 to 8.03
126 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2
Kidney function not reported not reported ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Dialysis not reported not reported ‐‐ ‐‐ ‐‐
Relapse 333 per 1000 367 per 1000
 (227 to 590) RR 1.10
 (0.68 to 1.77) 126 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2
Adverse events causing death or study drug discontinuation 190 per 1000 110 per 1000
 (48 to 263) RR 0.58
 (0.25 to 1.38) 126 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2
Severe adverse events 175 per 1000 79 per 1000
(30 to 215)
RR 0.58
0.25 to 1.38)
126 (1) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low1,2
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Single study results
 2 Wide CI