Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;2020(1):CD003232. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003232.pub4

Stegeman 1996.

Methods
  • Study design: parallel RCT

  • Duration of study: September 1990 to June 1993

  • Duration of follow‐up: to December 1994

Participants
  • Country: Netherlands

  • Setting: multicentre (11 sites)

  • Inclusion criteria: 3 groups of patients

    • Group 1: necrotising GN and upper or lower airways disease consistent with WG

    • Group 2: biopsy‐proven WG limited to the airways

    • Group 3: ANCA positive patients fulfilling American College of Rheumatologists criteria for WG but not for Groups 1 or 2

  • Number: treatment group (41); control group (40)

  • Median age, range (years): treatment group (56, 21 to 82); control group (57, 25 to 83)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group (30/11); control group (28/12)

  • Exclusion criteria: allergy or adverse reactions to co‐trimoxazole or one of its components; long term (> 6 weeks) antibiotic treatment; impaired kidney function (CrCl < 30 mL/min/24 hours)

Interventions Treatment group
  • TMP/SMX: 160/800 mg twice daily for 24 months


Control group
  • Placebo tablets for 24 months

Outcomes
  • Death

  • Remission at 24 months

  • Infections/patient/years

Notes
  • Compliance assessed by tablet counts

  • Supported by a grant from the Dutch Kidney Foundation (89.0872)

  • Roche Pharma Ltd., Reinach, Switzerland provided the TMP/SMX and matched placebo

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Stratified according to disease group. sequence generation not reported but all parties blinded
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Treatment assignment not known to investigators
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Treatment assignment not known to investigators, patients or physicians
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patients accounted for
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Study and review outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk Funding source stated