Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD006257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006257
Methods Country: Canada 
 Setting/Design: Multicentre 
 Time frame: NS 
 Randomisation method: NS 
 Blinding 
 ‐ Participants: Yes 
 ‐ Investigators: Yes 
 ‐ Outcome assessors: Yes 
 ‐ Data analysis: No 
 Intention‐to‐treat: Yes 
 Follow‐up period: mean 4.5 years 
 Loss to follow‐up:13
Participants Inclusion criteria
  • Patients with and without diabetes aged 55 years or older with a history of cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease, stroke, or peripheral vascular disease) or diabetes plus at least one other cardiovascular risk factor (total cholesterol > 5.2 mmol/L, HDL cholesterol < 0.9 mmol/L, hypertension, known microalbuminuria, or current smoking)


Ramipril group
  • Number: 1808

  • Age: 65.3 (6.4)

  • Sex (M/F): 1112/636


Placebo group
  • Number: 1769

  • Age: 65.6 (6.6)

  • Sex (M/F): 1143/626


Exclusion criteria
  • Dipstick‐positive proteinuria or established diabetic nephropathy

  • Other severe renal disease

  • Hyperkalaemia

  • CHF

  • Low ejection fraction (< 0.4)

  • Uncontrolled hypertension

  • Recent MI or stroke (< 4weeks)

  • Use of or hypersensitivity to vitamin E or ACEi

Interventions Ramipril group 
 10 mg/d
Placebo group
Co‐interventions: No
Outcomes
  1. Development of MI, stroke or cardiovascular death

  2. Total mortality, admission to hospital for CHFor unstable angina, cardiovascular revascularisation or development of overt nephropathy

  3. Any heart failure, worsening angina, and the development of diabetes in people with no history of the disorder

  4. Progression of microalbuminuria or overt nephropathy in participants with diabetes

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate