Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct 18;2006(4):CD006257. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006257
Methods Country: UK 
 Setting/Design: University 
 Time frame: NS 
 Randomisation method: NS 
 Blinding 
 ‐ Participants: Yes 
 ‐ Investigators: Yes 
 ‐ Outcome assessors: No 
 ‐ Data analysis: No 
 Intention‐to‐treat: No 
 Follow‐up period: 48 weeks 
 Loss to follow‐up: 9
Participants Inclusion criteria
  • DM: Type 1 or 2

  • Age: 18‐70 years Incipient diabetic nephropathy

  • DBP: Resting ≤ 90 mm Hg


Lisinopril group
  • Number: 15

  • Age: 48.3 (13.0)

  • Sex (M/F): 11/4


Placebo group
  • Number: 17

  • Age: 49.1 (16.0)

  • Sex (M/F): 12/5


Exclusion criteria
  • Hypertension of any aetiology

  • Heart failure, aortic outflow obstruction, unstable angina or MI in the preceding 3 months

  • Renal disease other than diabetic nephropathy

  • SCr > 140 µmol/L

  • Low protein diet

  • Systemic malignancy

  • Clinically significant abnormality of hepatic, haemopoietic or endocrine function

  • Women of childbearing potential not using a medically acceptable method of birth control

  • Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

  • Hypersensitivity to ACEi

  • Treatment with the following medications: aldose reductase inhibitors, myoinositol, steroids, gold, penicillamine, NSAIDs, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, appetite suppressants, lithium, vasopressor nasal decongestants or cimetidine

Interventions Lisinopril group 
 10 mg/d
Placebo group
Co‐interventions: No
Outcomes
  1. AER

  2. Urinary excretion of prostaglandins

  3. GFR

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear