Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;2020(1):CD009256. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009256.pub3

Comparison 2. Subgroup analysis (cisplatin dose: 40 to 79 mg/m2 versus 80 to 100 mg/m2).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Overall survival 9   Hazard Ratio (Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 40 to 80 mg/m2 6 2508 Hazard Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.15 [1.03, 1.28]
1.2 80 to 100 mg/m2 4 1823 Hazard Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.83, 1.04]
2 1‐year survival rate 10   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 40 to 80 mg/m2 6 2508 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.85, 1.27]
2.2 80 to 100 mg/m2 5 1949 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.86, 1.08]
3 Response rate 11   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1 40 to 80 mg/m2 7 2524 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.94 [0.74, 1.20]
3.2 80 to 100 mg/m2 5 1949 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.77, 1.02]