Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;2020(1):CD009256. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009256.pub3

Mazzanti 2003.

Methods Inclusion:
Eligible participants had to meet the following criteria:
  • histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC;

  • stage IIIB or IV NSCLC (according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, 1992);

  • PS 0 to 2 on the ECOG scale;

  • aged 18 to 75 years;

  • at least 1 measurable lesion;

  • life expectancy > 12 weeks;

  • adequate bone marrow, hepatic, cardiac, and renal function.


Participants who had received previous radiotherapy were included if their assessable disease was outside of the radiation field.
 Exclusion:
Patients were ineligible if they had:
  • symptomatic central nervous system metastases;

  • second primary malignancy;

  • serious systemic disorders.

Participants Arm I: 58 people
Arm II: 62 people
Interventions Arm I: gemcitabine (1200 mg/m2) iv over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin (80 mg/m2) iv over 45 minutes on day 2, every 3 weeks
 Arm II: gemcitabine (1200 mg/m2) iv over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL X minutes) iv over 1 hour on day 2, every 3 weeks
Outcomes Primary outcome:
  • response rate


Secondary outcomes:
  • duration of response

  • toxicity

  • time to progression

  • overall survival

  • 1‐year survival

Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk The randomisation algorithm, based on the Pocock and Simon method (Pocock 1975), included ECOG PS (0/1 vs 2) and disease stage (IIIB vs IV) as stratification factors.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Eligible participants were randomised to 1 of 2 arms, GCb or GC, using a concealed list of random numbers. The randomisation algorithm was based on the Pocock and Simon method.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information about blinding process
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information about blinding process
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 5 participants were randomly assigned to the GC arm, but were ineligible to receive treatment (3 with an ECOG PS of 3 at baseline, 1 pretreated with chemotherapy, and 1 affected by a serious cardiac disease).
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting bias
Other bias High risk The trial was planned as a randomised phase II study to obtain information for further development in a controlled randomised phase III setting, thus the findings obtained from the treatment arm comparisons of this phase II study should be considered as exploratory.