Mazzanti 2003.
Methods |
Inclusion: Eligible participants had to meet the following criteria:
Participants who had received previous radiotherapy were included if their assessable disease was outside of the radiation field. Exclusion: Patients were ineligible if they had:
|
|
Participants | Arm I: 58 people Arm II: 62 people |
|
Interventions | Arm I: gemcitabine (1200 mg/m2) iv over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin (80 mg/m2) iv over 45 minutes on day 2, every 3 weeks Arm II: gemcitabine (1200 mg/m2) iv over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL X minutes) iv over 1 hour on day 2, every 3 weeks | |
Outcomes | Primary outcome:
Secondary outcomes:
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | The randomisation algorithm, based on the Pocock and Simon method (Pocock 1975), included ECOG PS (0/1 vs 2) and disease stage (IIIB vs IV) as stratification factors. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Eligible participants were randomised to 1 of 2 arms, GCb or GC, using a concealed list of random numbers. The randomisation algorithm was based on the Pocock and Simon method. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information about blinding process |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | No information about blinding process |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 5 participants were randomly assigned to the GC arm, but were ineligible to receive treatment (3 with an ECOG PS of 3 at baseline, 1 pretreated with chemotherapy, and 1 affected by a serious cardiac disease). |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No evidence of selective reporting bias |
Other bias | High risk | The trial was planned as a randomised phase II study to obtain information for further development in a controlled randomised phase III setting, thus the findings obtained from the treatment arm comparisons of this phase II study should be considered as exploratory. |