Skip to main content
. 2017 Mar 13;28(2):411–425. doi: 10.1007/s11222-017-9738-6

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Empirical evidence for consistency. The figure shows the mean squared estimation error E[||θ^n-θ||2] for the examples in Fig. 2 as a function of the sample size n (solid lines, circles). The mean was computed as an average over 100 outcomes. The dashed lines depict the mean ±2 standard errors. The linear trend on the log–log scale suggests convergence in quadratic mean, and hence consistency of the estimator θ^n. The results are for L1-regularized logistic regression, see Supplementary material 3 for the other classification methods