Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 13.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Appl Stat. 2019 Oct 17;13(3):1397–1429. doi: 10.1214/19-AOAS1240

Table 1.

Confusion table showing the empirical percentage of models predicted from three candidates: M{1}0, and M{1}1 and M{1}2 under simulation studies 16, 19 and 20 (see Tables 2, 3 and 4 in the Appendix), with NE = 300, δ=1100 and Δ=150s. 100 datasets from each study were generated and the BIC used to select the best fitted model

Predicted →
True ↓
M{1}0 M{1}1 M{1}2
M{1}0 100 0 0
M{1}1 0 98 2
M{1}2 0 1 99