Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;10:152. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57072-9

Table 7.

ROH regions overlaying the identified risk variants.

SNP ROH group and the method used to identify the ROH@ Consensus ROH region Distance to SNP from consensus ROH (in Mb) Number of individuals from the discovery cohort (n = 1353) harboring the ROH (Distribution into sub-cohort of participants diagnosed for T2DM (n = 605) versus sub-cohort of non-diabetic participants (n = 748)) Length of consensus ROH (in Kb) Count of SNPs in consensus ROH region Mean ± SD of ROH groups Distance to SNP from mean ± SD window (in Mb) Presence of SNP in ROH regions identified in worldwide population (from Pemberton et al. study48)
rs1002487/RPS6KA1 S18181 1:28864435–29062427 1.99 51 (29:22) 197.99 11 24917436–33009426 Overlapping Yes
S15572 1:28056342–28084571 1.19 44 (27:17) 28.23 5 27723540–28417372 0.85
rs487321/CADPS S71771 3:62647115–63435226 0.143 29 (17:12) 788.11 226 3:55304385–70777955 Overlapping Yes
S71761 3:62315312–62315312 0.475 29 (16:13) 0.001 1 3:55748124–68882499 Overlapping
S41142 3:61981197–62189189 0.60 31 (17:14) 207.99 85 3:56659352–67511033 Overlapping
S41152 3:62604010–62604010 0.186 31 (16:15) 0.001 1 3:57340271–67867749 Overlapping
S41162 3:62883050–63333375 0.0924 31 (18:13) 450.32 101 3:57761318–68455106 Overlapping
S41172 3:63663215–63670140 6.93 31 (18:13) 0.873 3 3:58212832–69120521 Overlapping
rs707927/[VARS, VWA7] S17061 6:31001421–32989521 0.744 53 (29:24) 1988.10 1077 6:26827255–36745549 Overlapping No, But LD SNP rs805267 (r2 = 0.69) is present
S6872 6:29569045–29593788 2.176 71 (38:33) 24.74 24 6:26617526–32545306 Overlapping
S8242 6:31872383–32161430 0.126 64 (34:30) 289.05 126 6:29115193–34918619 Overlapping
S10002 6:30112623–30125537 1.619 57 (30:27) 12.91 30 6:27129747–33108413 Overlapping
S10012 6:31572927–31572927 0.173 57 (31:26) 0.001 1 6:28490667–34655186 Overlapping
rs12600570/DHX58 S51531 17:39980819–40041676 Overlapping 34 (19:15) 60.858 8 17:36532212–43490282 Overlapping No, But LD SNP rs2074158 (r2 = 0.56) is present
S17412 17:40041676–40063083 0.219 43 (22:21) 21.408 5 17:39559717–40545041 Overlapping

@Two approaches were used to identify ROH segments (see Methods for details). Method 1: Markers that passed quality control were pruned for LD (r2 > 0.9) (n = 568,670) and employed to detect ROH segments using parameters suggested by Howrigan et al.52; Method 2: Un-pruned marker set (n = 632,375) was employed to detect ROH using parameters deployed in Christofidou et al.53.