Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 26;30(2):1137–1144. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06382-7

Table 3.

Univariate logistic regression analysis on the association of clinical and radiologic report variables with the presence of an RAI in the report of the secondary interpretation

Variable Univariate analysis
Odds ratio 95% CI p value
Patient age (years, continuous scale) 0.99 0.98–0.99 < 0.001
Patient gender (male vs female) 1.06 0.81–1.38 0.696
Hospital status (in- vs outpatient) 0.84 0.42–1.69 0.623
Indication for the secondary interpretation
  Infectious vs others 2.03 0.43–9.60 0.373
  Inflammatory vs others 0.60 0.18–1.96 0.397
  Oncologic vs others 0.69 0.52–0.93 0.014
  Trauma vs others 1.01 0.23–4.42 0.990
  Vascular vs others 1.28 0.38–4.35 0.695
Experience of the radiologist who made the secondary interpretation (years, continuous scale) 1.07 1.03–1.10 < 0.001

CI confidence interval