Skip to main content
. 2019 May 13;34(2):779–786. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06828-5

Table 2.

Characteristics of hospital stay

Intracorporeal knotting  Hem-o-lock Purse string suture p value
n = 229 n = 115 n = 538
ASA score 1.8 + 0.6 1.8 + 0.6 1.7 + 0.6 0.040*
Complicated appendicitisa (n) 49 (21.4%) 28 (24.3%) 117 (21.7%) 0.803
Laparoscopic grading system of acute appendicitis according to Gomes Scoreb 0.360
 0 12 (5.2%) 4 (3.5%) 18 (3.3%)
 1 95 (41.5%) 48 (41.7%) 272 (50.6%)
 2 75 (32.8) 36 (31.3%) 143 (26.6%)
 3a 22 (9.6%) 19 (16.5%) 60 (11.2%)
 3b 12 (5.2%) 4 (3.5%) 20 (3.7%)
 4a 6 (2.6%) 1 (0.9%) 7 (1.3%)
 4b 2 (0.9%) 1 (0.9%) 9 (1.7%)
 5 5 (2.2%) 2 (1.7%) 9 (1.7%)
Operative time (min) 76.0 + 46.5 74.3 + 33.8 71.4 + 44.6 0.400
Intraoperative lavage (n) 64 (27.9%) 23 (20.0%) 137 (25.5%) 0.279
Lavage volume (ml) 141.4 + 96.5 223.9 + 194.7 149.3 + 129.1 0.025*
Drain usage (n) 112 (48.9%) 44 (38.3%) 208 (38.7%) 0.024*
Length of drainage (days) 2.97 + 1.57 3.12 + 1.81 2.92 + 1.64 0.772
Hospital stay (days) 4.41 + 2.40 4.43 + 2.66 3.72 + 2.35 0.001*

*p < 0.05

aComplicated appendicitis: gangrenous, perforated, purulent appendicitis with abscess and/or localized/diffuse peritonitis and delayed appendicitis

bGomes Score: the appendix was graded as to different levels based upon its visual appearance: grade 0 (normal looking), 1 (redness and edema), 2 (fibrin), 3a (segmental necrosis), 3b (base necrosis), 4a (abscess), 4b (regional peritonitis), and 5 (diffuse peritonitis)