Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 21;225(1):365–374. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-02004-6

Table 2.

Associations between TOL performance and global network measures

TOL Model B (SE) 95% CI (BCa) Beta PbCa R2
RT Age 0.09 (0.015) 0.06, 0.12 0.595 < 0.001
GE 9.79 (4.72) 0.84, 19.8 0.219 0.039 0.293
Motion − 16.46 (6.53) − 30.6, − 5.7 − 0.230 0.008
Age 0.08 (0.017) 0.04, 0.11 0.531 < 0.001
Gcc − 32.88 (53.72) − 133.9, 68.8 − 0.089 0.567 0.252
Motion − 12.03 (7.69) − 26.6, 2.3 − 0.168 0.113
ACC Age − 0.131 (.073) − 0.28, − 0.009 − 0.241 0.079
GE − 31.1 (21.57) − 76.3, 9.6 − 0.194 0.156 0.06
Motion − 21.62 (29.23) − 69.0, 43.1 − 0.084 0.450
Age − 0.09 (.075) − 0.24, 0.05 − 0.164 0.249
Gcc 206.28 (155.46) − 79.3, 515.3 0.154 0.187 0.05
Motion − 41.39 (27.02) − 89.5, 13.3 − 0.161 0.117

For each analysis, age was entered in model 1, the network measure in model 2 and motion parameters in model 3. Only the results of model 3 are shown here. P values are bootstrapped using 2000 permutations

TOL Tower of London task, RT reaction time, ACC accuracy, SE standard error, CI confidence interval, BCa Bias corrected and accelerated, GE global efficiency, Gcc global clustering coefficient