Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 5;30(2):1062–1074. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06459-3

Table 4.

Normalized brain volume and brain volume calculated with SIENAX in the AD dataset. From left to right, the table lists median [1st and 3rd quartiles] for volumes; Bonferroni-corrected p values for the pairwise comparison of volumes from FFR-processed and full images; volume differences between the full and FFR-processed images as mL and % differences (median [1st and 3rd quartiles]); and ICC (absolute agreement (lower-upper band of 95% CI)) between volumes from full and FFR-processed images

AD n = (110) Normalized brain volume Brain volume
Volume (L) p value Difference ICC (lower-upper) Volume (L) p value Difference ICC (lower-upper)
mL % Ml %
Full

1.39

[1.34; 1.44]

1.09

[1.01; 1.16]

QuickShear

1.39

[1.35; 1.44]

0.266

1.26

[− 4.40; 8.62]

0.09

[− 0.32; 0.64]

0.835

(0.767–0.884)

1.09

[1.01; 1.16]

0.001

− 2.44

[− 5.11; − 1.22]

− 025

[− 0.48; − 0.11]

0.982

(0.982–0.993)

FaceMasking

1.40

[1.35; 1.46]

0.003

5.91

[− 1.57; 16.38]

0.44

[− 0.12; 1.19]

0.896

(0.842–0.931)

1.09

[1.01; 1.16]

0.392

− 0.52

[− 2.47; 1.10]

− 0.05

[− 0.2; 0.10]

0.973

(0.960–0.981)

Defacing

1.39

[1.35; 1.44]

1.000

− 2.17

[− 10.80; 7.81]

− 0.16

[− 0.80; 0.55]

0.715

(0.610–0.795)

1.07

[0.99; 1.14]

< 0.001

− 7.60

[− 12.13; − 4.71]

− 0.69

[− 1.14; 0.43]

0.933

(0.8.74–0.961)

Only the images for which FFR was successful and for which the segmentation was successful are included

ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient; n, number of subjects; AD, Alzheimer’s disease