Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 18;19:602–611. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.12.010

Table 3.

The Comparison with Related Models

Methods AUC Scores
RLSMDAa 86.17%
PBSIb 54.02%
MBSIb 74.83%
NetCBIb 80.66%
MaxFlowc 86.93%
miRGOFSd 87.70%
HGIMDAe 87.81%
MDHGIf 87.94%
LMTRDAg 90.54%
DBMDA 91.29%
a

The results of the method are reported in Chen and Yan.23

b

The results of the method are reported in Chen and Zhang.27

c

The results of the method are reported in Yu et al.28

d

The results of the method are reported in Yang et al.30

e

The results of the method are reported in Chen et al.20

f

The results of the method are reported in Chen et al.31

g

The results of the method are reported in Wang et al.44