Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;11(2):972–980.

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of RFS

Parameters Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis

HR 95% CI p HR 95% CI p
Gender
    Female vs. Male 0.860 0.546-1.353 0.514
Age (years)
    ≥60 years vs. <60 years 1.303 0.831-2.044 0.249
Location of tumor
    The distal 1/2 vs. The proximal 1/2 0.850 0.511-1.415 0.533
Preoperative CEA (ng/ml)
    ≥5 ng/ml vs. <5 ng/ml 1.593 0.986-2.573 0.057
Tumor size (cm)
    ≥5 cm vs. <5 cm 2.486 1.566-3.948 <0.001 1.108 0.654-1.877 0.704
Clinical stage
    III-IV vs. I-II 5.821 3.287-10.309 <0.001 2.628 1.223-5.646 0.013
Depth of invasion
    T3-T4 vs. T1-T2 5.001 2.763-9.050 <0.001 2.860 1.335-6.127 0.007
Lymph node status
    N2-N3 vs. N0-N1 2.921 1.840-4.639 <0.001 2.113 1.218-3.668 0.008
Histological grade
    Poor vs. Well + Moderately 1.966 1.213-3.186 0.006 1.834 1.046-3.217 0.034
Nerve invasion
    Yes vs. No 1.249 0.795-1.961 0.335
Vascular invasion
    Yes vs. No 2.709 1.725-4.255 <0.001 1.842 1.132-2.999 0.014
SCUBE2 expression
    Low vs. High 2.468 1.535-3.969 <0.001 1.746 1.060-2.875 0.029

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval. Bold numbersindicate statistical significance, P<0.05.