Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;20:12. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-1419-1

Table 4.

Comparison of recorded parameters between young and older women groups

Parameters Young women (n = 40), mean ± SD Older women (n = 40), mean ± SD U z p r
HGS, D (kgf) 26.07 ± 5.00 19.64 ± 3.52 226.5 5.51 ≤ 0.05 0.87
Fatigue, D (%) 24.53 ± 8.52 48.09 ± 12.72 146 −6.29 ≤ 0.05 −0.99
SD1, D (kgf) 1.19 ± 0.37 1.63 ± 0.26 235 − 5.43 ≤ 0.05 −0.86
SD2, D (kgf) 3.44 ± 0.79 5.38 ± 1.52 203 −5.74 ≤ 0.05 −0.91
SD1/SD2, D 0.36 ± 0.14 0.35 ± 0.17 657 1.37
AFE, D (kgf2) 13.07 ± 5.62 27.41 ± 8.26 122.5 −6.51 ≤ 0.05 −1.03
HGS, ND (kgf) 23.38 ± 4.50 17.10 ± 3.17 182 5.94 ≤ 0.05 0.94
Fatigue, ND (%) 26.70 ± 10.43 53.84 ± 7.82 27 −7.43 ≤ 0.05 −1.17
SD1, ND (kgf) 1.14 ± 0.30 1.58 ± 0.21 206.5 −5.71 ≤ 0.05 −0.90
SD2, ND (kgf) 3.25 ± 0.71 5.05 ± 1.25 187 −5.89 ≤ 0.05 −0.93
SD1/SD2, ND 0.37 ± 0.13 0.34 ± 0.11 677 1.18
AFE, ND (kgf2) 11.73 ± 4.28 25.17 ± 7.42 72 −7.00 ≤ 0.05 −1.11

HGS hand grip strength, D dominant, ND nondominant, SD standard deviation, AFE area of the fitting ellipse, n number of subjects, U Mann–Whitney’s U-test values, z scores, p thresholds of statistical significance, r effect size coefficient