Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;17:3. doi: 10.1186/s12983-019-0348-3

Table 2.

Significance of individual contrasts comparing different treatment combinations on morphometric characters

Contrast Total body length Snout-vent length Tail length Body width
Control vs ECO2 ns ns ns ns
Control vs ETem32 0.0075 0.0488 0.0275 ns
Control vs ETem34 0.0022 < 0.0001 0.0089 0.0033
Control vs (ETem32, ETem34) 0.0022 0.0011 0.0087 0.0344
ETem32 vs ETem34 ns 0.0101 ns 0.0220
ECO2 vs ETem32 0.0436 Ns ns ns
ECO2 vs ETem34 0.0500 0.0016 ns 0.0321
ECO2 vs (ETem32, ETem34) 0.0227 0.0040 ns 0.0477

Significance of these contrasts was tested in repeated measures analyses of variance carried out using PROC MIXED in SAS for the whole experimental period. Contrasts involving ECO2 involved data during the initial 5 weeks after hatching. Contrasts involving the control and ETem34 involved data during the initial 11 weeks after hatching