Table 7.
Cell type | All treatments | Treatment comparison | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Control vs ETem32 | Control vs ECO2 | ETem32 vs ECO2 | ||
% WBC in RBC | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | ns |
% Thrombocytes | 0.0006 | < 0.0001 | 0.0154 | ns |
% Lymphocytes | 0.0007 | 0.0262 | 0.0004 | ns |
% Eosinophils | ns | – | – | – |
% Basophils | ns | – | – | – |
% Monocytes | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | ns | < 0.0001 |
% Neutrophils | 0.0046 | < 0.0001 | ns | < 0.0001 |
Significance of treatment effects and treatment comparisons were tested using a Z-statistic calculated from the maximum likelihood frequencies and their standard errors obtained in a categorical data analysis using PROC CATMOD in SAS