Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 13;20:33. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4749-x

Table 3.

Diagnostic accuracy of Ultra on FNA and tissue measured against the composite reference standard and culture

Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV LR+ LR-
Composite reference standard
 Ultra on FNA (n = 73 participants) 21/30; 70% (51–85) 43/43; 100% (92–100) 100% 83% inv 0.3
 Ultra on tissue (n = 81 participants) 16/24; 67% (45–84) 55/57; 96% (88–99) 89% 87% 16.8 0.3
Excluding the 21 participants on tuberculosis therapy>24 h
 Ultra on FNA (n = 57 participants) 12/20; 60% (36–81) 37/37; 100% (91–100) 100% 82% inv 0.4
 Ultra on tissue (n = 66 participants) 10/18; 56% (31–78) 46/48; 96% (86–99) 83% 85% 14 0.5
Culture as the reference standard (n = 99 participants)
 Ultra on FNA (n = 73 participants) 7/9; 78% (40–97) 50/64; 78% (66–87) 33% 96% 3.5 0.3
 Ultra on tissue (n = 81 participants) 9/10; 90% (55–100) 62/71; 87% (77–94) 50% 98% 6.9 0.1

Data are n/N; % (95% CI). FNA Fine-needle aspirate, AFBs Acid fast bacilli, PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value, LR likelihood ratio