Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 14;19:17. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-3107-1

Table 1.

Degrees of freedom (df), log-Likelihood (log(L)), AICc, ΔAICc (AICcmodel − AICcmin model), and AICc w (AICc weight) for each linear model in the conversion analysis ordered in descending fit (best-fitting model at the top)

Model description:
Log10 (Conversion) ~
df log(L) AICc ΔAICc AICc w
Donor photoschedule 3 − 1.704 11.41 0.000 0.688
Donor photoschedule + parasite schedule 4 − 1.061 13.76 2.351 0.212
Null 2 − 5.764 16.45 5.044 0.055
Donor photoschedule + parasite schedule + donor photoschedule*parasite schedule 5 − 1.037 18.07 6.667 0.025
Schedule 3 − 5.259 18.52 7.110 0.020

The response variable for each model is the log10-transformed conversion rate. “Parasite schedule” refers to parasites either in-synch or out-of-synch with the host, and “donor photoschedule” corresponds to parasites taken from donor mice kept in either the standard or reversed light:dark schedule. The null model includes only “mouse” as a random effect