Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 14;19:17. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-3107-1

Table 2.

Degrees of freedom (df), log-Likelihood (log(L)), AICc, ΔAICc (AICci − AICcmin), and AIC w (AICc weight) for each linear model in the TNF ii analysis ordered in descending fit

Model description:
sqrt(gametocyte density) ~ + (1|mouse)
df log(L) AICc ΔAICc AICc w
Inj.time + samp.time 6 − 137.7 288.1 0.000 0.482
Samp.time 5 − 139.6 289.7 1.588 0.218
Inj.time + samp.time + treatment 7 − 137.8 290.6 2.497 0.138
Inj.time + samp.time + treatment + inj.time*treatment 8 − 137.1 291.4 3.318 0.092
Samp.time + treatment 6 − 139.7 292.1 3.953 0.067
Inj.time 4 − 145.3 299.0 10.872 0.002
Null 3 − 147.2 300.6 12.536 0.001
Inj.time + treatment 5 − 145.4 301.4 13.291 0.001
Treatment 4 − 147.3 302.9 14.825 0.000

The response variable for each model is the square root-transformed gametocyte density and the random effect is “mouse”. “Samp.time” refers to sampling time (2- or 12-HPI), “inj.time” refers to injection time (ZT0 or ZT12 respectively), and treatment is either TNF-α or control. The null model includes only “mouse” as a random effect