Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 14;19:17. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-3107-1

Table 3.

Degrees of freedom (df), log-Likelihood (log(L)), AICc, ΔAICc (AICcmodel − AICcmin model), and AICc w for each linear model in the analysis of experiment iii ordered in descending fit

Model description: sqrt(Gametocyte Density) ~ + (1|mouse) df log(L) AICc ΔAICc AICc w
Age 5 − 99.37 209.6 0.000 0.409
Age + treatment + age * treatment 8 − 96.15 210.4 0.850 0.267
Age + treatment 6 − 99.08 211.4 1.785 0.168
Null 3 − 103.5 213.3 3.759 0.062
Age + samp.time 7 − 99.52 214.7 5.088 0.032
Treatment 4 − 103.3 215.1 5.469 0.027
Age + samp.time + treatment + age*treatment 10 − 96.38 216.1 6.556 0.015
Age + samp.time + treatment 8 − 99.22 216.6 7.000 0.012
Samp.time 5 − 103.7 218.3 8.743 0.005
Samp.time + treatment 6 − 103.5 220.2 10.57 0.002

The response variable for each model is the square root-transformed gametocyte density and the random effect is “mouse”. “Samp.time” refers to sampling time (4-, 8- or 12-HPI), “age” refers to gametocyte age (19-, 25-, or 31-h old) and treatment is either TNF-α or control. The null model includes only “mouse” as a random effect