Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 1;11(5):1082–1093. doi: 10.7150/jca.34527

Table 6.

Sensitivity analysis of studies with more than 100 patients on Patient-level analysis and Lesion-level analysis

Study ID Patient-level analysis Lesion-level analysis
Median Lower Quartile Upper Quartile Median Lower Quartile Upper Quartile
NBI vs WLC (n=2) NBI vs WLC (n=3)
Sensitivity 100 - - 92.86 90.08 95.63
Specificity 65.78 - - 76.85 73.01 81.58
Positive predictive value 76.63 - - 68.42 61.17 71.79
Negative predictive value 100 - - 100 98.82 100
False positive rate 33.53 - - 23.15 18.42 26.99
False negative rate 0 - - 7.14 4.37 9.92
HAL vs WLC (n=1) HAL vs WLC (n=4)
Sensitivity 83.33 - - 92.19 91.48 92.97
Specificity 92.75 - - 85.74 77.33 87.42
Positive predictive value 80 - - 73.26 70.05 77.94
Negative predictive value 93.81 - - 96.13 91.70 99.68
False positive rate 7.25 - - 14.26 12.58 22.67
False negative rate 16.67 - - 6.84 5.24 7.65
5-ALA vs WLC (n=2) 5-ALA vs WLC (n=2)
Sensitivity 89.67 - - 94.42 - -
Specificity 75.05 - - 80.28 - -
Positive predictive value 77.65 - - 66.33 - -
Negative predictive value 75.47 - - 98.25 - -
False positive rate 24.96 - - 19.72 - -
False negative rate 10.33 - - 5.58 - -

NMIBC: non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; WLC: white light cystoscopy; 5-ALA: 5-aminolaevulinic acid; HAL: hexylaminolevulinate; NBI: narrow band imaging; NR: not reported.