Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 6;27(1):1–17. doi: 10.1159/000501404

Table 1.

Description of participants, resected lesions, outcomes, complications, and follow-up

Esophagus Stomach Colon and rectum
Experience reported, n (%)
  Their own 51 (19) 78 (29) 62 (23)
  Unit experience 52 (11) 76 (16) 62 (13)
Number of cases treated by ESD in 2016, median (IQR)
  Per endoscopist 7 (1–21) 6 (4–16) 28 (5–63)
  Per center 10 (5–50) 19 (8–39) 37 (14–70)
Number of cases ever treated by ESD (IQR)
  Per endoscopist 25 (2–71) 25 (11–52) 140 (12–217)
  Per center 34 (15–300) 98 (38–190) 170 (40–340)
Cases scheduled for ESD in which ESD was performed, % 92 90 82
Location, %
  Cardia 13
  Fundus 4
  Gastric body 29
  Incisura 19
  Antrum 35
  Rectum 44
  Sigmoid/descending colon 21
  Transverse colon 11
  Ascending colon 25
Cases >20 mm, % 71 65 92
Paris classification, %
  I 16 19 24
  II 82 75 65
  III 0 4 4
  Scar (local recurrence) 1 2 7
Histological diagnosis, %
  LGIN/HGIN 36 59
  AC 25
  SCC 19
Intramucosal carcinoma 47 25
  AC 53
  SCC 65
Submucosal invasion 17 16
  AC 22
  SCC 16
Short-term outcomes, %
  En bloc resection 97 95 84
  R0 resection 88 91 81
  R1 resection 9 5 10
  Rx resection 3 4 9
  Curative cases 69 70 67
Complications, %
  Frank perforation 1.7 1.2 4.3
  Micro perforation 1.5 0.8 2.3
  Major acute bleeding during procedure 0.5 0.5 1.8
  Delayed bleeding 2.8 4.6 5.2
  Submitted to surgery due to ESD complications 0.5 0.3 1.7
Follow-up, %
  Local recurrence 2.4 1.6 2.4
  Metachronous recurrence 11.3 8.4 10.2

ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; LGIN, low grade intraepithelial neoplasia; HGIN, high grade intraepithelial neoplasia; AC, adenocarcinoma; SCC, squamous cell cancer.