Table 6.
Summary of a pigeonpea consensus genetic map constructed from five component genetic maps.
| Consensus map | Number of markers contributed from component genetic maps and their correlation with consensus map | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pop1 | Pop2 | Pop3 | Pop4 | Pop5 | |||||||||
| LG† | N | ML (cM) | AID (cM) | N | “r” | n | “r” | n | “r” | n | “r” | n | “r” |
| CcLG01 | 52 | 136.8 | 2.6 | — | — | 11 | 0.97*** | 13 | 0.81*** | 1 | — | 20 | 0.91*** |
| CcLG02 | 219 | 224.3 | 1.0 | 9 | −0.80** | 12 | 0.97*** | 13 | 0.99*** | 172 | 0.23** | 30 | 0.95*** |
| CcLG03 | 46 | 162.0 | 3.5 | 25 | 0.95*** | 15 | 0.97*** | 13 | 0.97*** | — | — | 22 | 0.95** |
| CcLG04 | 29 | 49.6 | 1.7 | 11 | 0.89*** | 4 | 0.99*** | 3 | 1.00* | — | — | 18 | 0.57* |
| CcLG05 | 24 | 140.1 | 5.8 | 7 | 1.00*** | 4 | 0.99** | 10 | 1.00*** | — | — | 13 | −0.87*** |
| CcLG06 | 76 | 139.6 | 1.8 | 36 | 0.34* | 23 | 0.98*** | 27 | 0.95*** | — | — | 48 | 0.94*** |
| CcLG07 | 26 | 133.1 | 5.1 | 10 | −0.84** | 8 | −0.95*** | 5 | 1.00*** | 5 | 0.14NS | 8 | −0.73* |
| CcLG08 | 34 | 119.3 | 3.5 | 16 | −0.98*** | — | — | 13 | −0.97*** | 24 | 0.98*** | ||
| CcLG09 | 19 | 96.0 | 5.1 | 12 | 0.42NS | 6 | 0.99*** | 9 | 0.91*** | — | — | 8 | −0.95*** |
| CcLG10 | 95 | 205.1 | 2.2 | 11 | 0.99*** | 3 | 1.00*** | 16 | 0.93*** | 2 | — | 8 | 0.99*** |
| CcLG11 | 364 | 203.8 | 0.6 | 55 | −0.66*** | 47 | 0.90*** | 82 | −0.37*** | 173 | 0.00NS | 102 | 0.107NS |
| Total | 984 | 1609.5 | 1.6 | 192 | 133 | 204 | 352 | 301 | |||||
NS: not significantly different from zero at 0.05 probability level; *, ** and ***: significantly different from zero at 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001 probability levels, respectively. Pop1: ICP 11605 × ICP 14209, Pop2: ICP 8863 × ICP 11605, Pop3: HPL 24 × ICP 11605, Pop4: ICP 8863 × ICPL 87119, Pop5: ICP 5529 × ICP 11605, LG: linkage group, n: number of markers, ML: map length, AID: average inter-marker distance, “r”: correlation coefficient.