Figure 7.
Predictive performance of CD206 for OS and EFS compared with classical prognostic markers (BAALC, ERG, EVI1, MN1, and WT1). (a and b) Forest plot reporting the overall concordance indices for the six genes in all AML cases (a) and CN-AML cases (b). The concordance indices were combined for datasets with OS information (left) and EFS information (right), respectively. (c and d) Forest plot reporting the overall hazard ratios and p-values for the six genes in all AML cases (c)and CN-AML cases (d). The hazard ratios and p-values were combined for datasets with OS information (left) and EFS information (right), respectively. The p-values were computed from Cox regression analysis in each dataset and combined using the weighted Z-method. Results for individual genes in each dataset were provided in Figure S13–16.