Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 20;43(2):169–178. doi: 10.1007/s00449-019-02214-6

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparing the RMSE values of the stepwise integral estimations (a) and stepwise integral estimations using a moving average (n = 4) as a function of the sampling interval and CV of biomass determination. b The timely deviation (%) from the time point when the simulated µ changed 15% (non-competitive model) derived from utilizing moving average with a window size of 3 and 4. The number of simulated processes n = 100