Table 4.

Method application data for the analytes considered in urine from anonymous adult volunteers (general population), and from occupational firefighters (exposed population)^a.

Analyte	General population (N = 158)			Firefighters (N = 145)

	Detection Frequency (%)	Median (ng mL ⁻¹)	Range (ng mL ⁻¹)	Detection Frequency (%)	Median (ng mL ⁻¹)	Range (ng mL ⁻¹)

BCEtP	49	< LOD	< LOD − 41	87	0.84	< LOD − 9.8
BCPP	51	0.11	< LOD − 3.0	63	0.24	< LOD − 3.0
BDCPP	78	0.30	< LOD − 64	97	3.3	< LOD − 42
DBuP	9	< LOD	< LOD − 4.3	53	0.12	< LOD − 2.9
DPhP	70	0.26	< LOD − 12	100	4.0	0.14–32
TBBA	2	< LOD	< LOD − 0.38	4	0.10	< LOD − 0.13
iPPPP	16	< LOD	< LOD − 0.45	35	0.11	< LOD − 0.49
tBPPP	9	< LOD	< LOD − 0.19	83	0.17	< LOD − 1.1
DMP	80	0.68	< LOD − 130	88	9.9	< LOD − 190
DMTP	73	0.39	< LOD − 190	90	15	< LOD − 300
DMDTP	35	< LOD	< LOD − 14	57	1.2	< LOD − 11
DEP	92	0.73	< LOD − 52	88	4.2	< LOD − 60
DETP	56	0.12	< LOD − 11	68	0.74	< LOD − 5.0
DEDTP	4	< LOD	< LOD − 0.74	4	0.22	< LOD − 0.35

DBzP and DCP were not detected in any of the samples tested.