Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 30;22:21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.11.011

Table 4.

Computational outputs from the PSO for the base case (Two interval).

[Recycle amount (kg/s), Bottom operating pressure of deethanizer (MPaa), Bottom operating pressure of debutanizer (MPaa)]
First Interval [12–45, 0.45–0.85, 0.5–0.7]
Execution number
1 2 3 4 5
Optimum recycled flowrate (kg/s) 12 12 12 12 12
Optimum bottom operating pressure for deethanizer(MPaa) 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Optimum bottom operating pressure for debutanizer (MPaa) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
TAC (1000 USD/year) 1132.90 1132.92 1132.95 1132.90 1132.98
CPU time (s) 973 978 1026 950 1000
Function evaluations 690 690 690 690 690
Second Interval [3.2–12, 0.8–0.85, 0.5–0.7]
Execution number
1 2 3 4 5
Optimum recycled flowrate (kg/s) 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Optimum bottom operating pressure for deethanizer (MPaa) 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85
Optimum bottom operating pressure for debutanizer (MPaa) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
TAC (1000 USD/year) 821.420 821.465 821.452 821.420 821.420
CPU time (s) 493 480 490 490 490
Function evaluations 660 660 660 660 660