Table 1.

Characteristics of the Study Sample by Sex

Characteristic	Total	Female (n = 494)	Male (n = 128)	p-value
Sociodemographics
Age (years)	58.0 (48.-68.)	57 (47–69)	60 (51–66)	0.6334
Highest Education				0.4214
< HS	81 (13%)	65 (13%)	16 (13%)
HS	257 (41%)	208 (42%)	49 (38%)
Some college/Tech	200 (32%)	160 (32%)	40 (31%)
College/Grad School	84 (14%)	61 (12%)	23 (18%)
Married	111 (18%)	21 (16%)	90 (18%)	0.6332
Household Income	12,500 (7500-25,000)	12,500 (7500-25,000)	17,500 (7500-35,000)	0.1460
Physical Function	70.0 (45.0–90.0)	70 (45–90)	75 (50–95)	0.1478
Time Spent in Neighborhood (years)	31.0 (9.0–50.0)	31 (8–50)	30 (9–50)	0.8091
Baseline Neighborhood Scales
Infrastructure Scale	3.2 (2.8–3.6)	3.2 (2.8–3.6)	3.2 (2.8–3.6)	0.7079
Perceived Safety Scale	3.0 (2.5–3.5)	3.0 (2.5–3.5)	3.0 (2.5–3.5)	0.4643
Aesthetics Scale	2.7 (2.0–4.0)	2.7 (2.0–3.7)	2.7 (2.0–4.0)	0.8849
Baseline Neighborhood Satisfaction	4.0 (3.0–4.0)	4.0 (3.0–4.0)	4.0 (3.0–4.0)	0.4538
Perceived Change in Neighborhood
Improvement in Infrastructure	301 (48%)	238 (48%)	63 (49%)	0.8337
Improvement in Safety	293 (47%)	238 (48%)	55 (43%)	0.2927
Improvement in Aesthetics	283 (46%)	226 (46%)	57 (45%)	0.8052
Improvement in Neighborhood Satisfaction	176 (28%)	153 (31%)	23 (18%)	0.0036
Cardiometabolic Outcomes (2016)
BMI (kg/m [2])	30.0 (25.4–35.2)	30.5 (26.0–35.7)	27.4 (23.1–32.4)	<.0001
SBP (mmHg)	127.0 (117.5–142.0)	126.0 (116.4–140.3)	131.0 (120.0–148.0)	0.0351
DBP (mmHg)	79.5 (71.5–87.0)	80.0 (71.4–87.0)	79.0 (72.0–87.0)	0.9404
HbA1c (%)	5.8 (5.5–6.3)	5.9 (5.5–6.3)	5.8 (5.4–6.2)	0.1490
HDL (mg/dL)	52.3 (43.2–61.5)	53.2 (43.4–63.5)	47.0 (41.7–57.0)	0.0052

Note: Results are presented as mean (range) for continuous variables and N (%) for categorical variables