Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;8(1):208–216. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.208

Table 3.

Summary of radiological features of 44 patients

Radiological features Number
Location Left lobe 18/44 (40.9%)
Right lobe 10/44 (22.7%)
Hepatic hilum 4/44 (9.0%)
Multiple 1/44 (2.3%)
Unknown 11/44 (25.0%)
Tumor size (cm)1 9.0 ± 5.2
US Hypoechoic 6/23 (26.1%)
Hyperechoic 3/23 (13.0%)
Mixed-echoic 10/23 (45.5%)
Unseen 1/23 (4.3%)
Unknown 3/23 (13.0%)
CT Plain Low density 19/19 (100%)
Enhancement Enhanced peripheral areas (progressive enhancement to the central region) 22/23 (95.7%)
(12/23) (52.2%)
Without enhancement 1/23 (4.3%)
MRI T1 WI Iso/Low intensity 6/8 (75.0%)
T2 WI High intensity border 1/8 (12.5%)
High and low intensity 5/8 (62.5%)
Unknown 2/8 (25.0%)
Enhancement Enhanced peripheral areas (progressive enhancement to the central region) 2/8 (25.0%)
(2/8) (25.0%)
Unknown 6/8 (75.0%)
Angiography Hypovascularity 1/3 (33.3%)
Unknown 2/3 (66.7%)
1

Values for tumor size are presented as means ± SD (n = 44). CT: Computed tomography; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging.s