Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 12;29(1):289–301. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02292-9

Table 3.

Multiple linear regression analyses on TTO values, by type of TTO task, EQ VAS score, sociodemographic variables, and interviewer

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7
Estimate p value Estimate p value Estimate p value Estimate p value Estimate p value Estimate p value Estimate p value
Intercept 0.717 0.000* 0.666 0.000* 0.676 0.000* 0.403 0.000* 0.334 0.003* 0.368 0.001* 0.297 0.014*
Type of TTO taska 0.162 0.000* 0.168 0.000* 0.168 0.000* 0.163 0.000* 0.168 0.000* 0.173 0.000* 0.169 0.000*
Age groupb
 45–64 years 0.061 0.249 0.057 0.302 0.045 0.402 0.034 0.526 0.046 0.408 0.039 0.481
 65+ years 0.044 0.443 0.040 0.492 0.065 0.257 0.066 0.266 0.089 0.190 0.072 0.304
Sexc − 0.012 0.748 − 0.005 0.881 − 0.009 0.803 0.002 0.960 0.002 0.948
EQ VAS score 0.004 0.001* 0.004 0.001* 0.004 0.001* 0.004 0.000*
Educational leveld
 Primary school 0.131 0.025* 0.150 0.010* 0.148 0.011*
 Middle school 0.069 0.201 0.101 0.069 0.112 0.044*
 High school 0.066 0.241 0.118 0.048 0.119 0.046*
 College and above 0.031 0.665 0.071 0.332 0.078 0.292
Occupational statuse
 Employed − 0.105 0.031* − 0.078 0.127
 Retired − 0.088 0.094 − 0.086 0.102
Interviewerf
 Interviewer 2 0.067 0.115
 Interviewer 3 0.061 0.148
Observation 156 156 156 156 156 156 156
AIC − 27.145 − 24.492 − 22.595 − 31.243 − 28.754 − 29.607 − 28.651
Adjusted R2 0.116 0.112 0.107 0.160 0.167 0.181 0.186
R2 0.122 0.129 0.130 0.187 0.215 0.239 0.254

TTO time trade-off, AIC akaike information criterion

*p < 0.05

aReference group: iteration-based TTO task

bReference group: 27–44 years

cReference group: female

dReference group: below primary school

eReference group: nonemployed

fReference group: interviewer 1