Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 12;29(1):289–301. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02292-9

Table 4.

Multiple linear regression analyses on TTO values (incl. modified open-ended TTO task) by type of TTO task, EQ VAS score, sociodemographic variables, and interviewer

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7
Estimate p value Estimate p value Estimate p value Estimate p value Estimate p value Estimate p value Estimate p value
Intercept 0.739 0.000* 0.713 0.000* 0.719 0.000* 0.385 0.000* 0.318 0.000* 0.358 0.000* 0.300 0.004*
Type of TTO taska
 Open-ended 0.162 0.000* 0.162 0.000* 0.162 0.000* 0.157 0.000* 0.162 0.000* 0.167 0.000* 0.165 0.000*
 Modified open-ended 0.023 0.619 0.019 0.688 0.019 0.677 0.027 0.534 0.039 0.370 0.048 0.270 0.052 0.227
Age groupb
 45–64 years 0.014 0.772 0.011 0.819 0.010 0.841 − 0.003 0.948 0.007 0.893 0.006 0.900
 65+ years − 0.012 0.827 − 0.014 0.790 0.030 0.561 0.030 0.584 0.050 0.424 0.042 0.512
Sexc − 0.007 0.823 − 0.001 0.968 − 0.015 0.659 0.000 0.993 0.003 0.937
EQ VAS score 0.004 0.000* 0.004 0.000* 0.004 0.000* 0.004 0.000*
Educational leveld
 Primary school 0.142 0.005 0.170 0.001* 0.173 0.001*
 Middle school 0.069 0.148 0.103 0.035* 0.111 0.022*
 High school 0.084 0.097 0.136 0.012* 0.139 0.010*
 College and above 0.043 0.500 0.087 0.181 0.095 0.143
Occupational statuse
 Employed − 0.108 0.016* − 0.086 0.067
 Retired − 0.092 0.053 − 0.086 0.069
Interviewerf
 Interviewer 2 0.058 0.126
 Interviewer 3 0.041 0.283
Observation 189 189 189 189 189 189 189
AIC − 27.226 − 23.750 − 21.800 − 39.853 − 40.084 − 42.255 − 40.689
Adjusted R2 0.099 0.092 0.087 0.174 0.193 0.211 0.212
R2 0.108 0.111 0.111 0.201 0.236 0.261 0.271

TTO time trade-off, AIC akaike information criterion

*p < 0.05

aReference group: iteration-based TTO task

bReference group: 27–44 years

cReference group: female

dReference group: below primary school

eReference group: nonemployed

fReference group: interviewer 1