Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 15;10:338. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56989-5

Table 5.

Detailed performance of the proposed method.

Group Class #Samples Results
CV Train Test SN(%) SP(%) GM(%) BA(%)
HEALTHY Normal parenchyma (NP) 600 23096 0.8937 0.9649 0.9286 0.9293
INTERSTITIAL Ground glass (GG) 600 34 0.9118 0.9907 0.9504 0.9512
Reticular (RETIC) 600 4809 0.8064 0.9501 0.8753 0.8782
Nodular (NOD) 600 30 0.9667 0.9977 0.9820 0.9822
Linear scar (LINSC) 600 48 0.9375 0.9936 0.9652 0.9656
Subpleural line (SUBPL) 600 103 0.8544 0.9907 0.9200 0.9225
EMPHYSEMA Paraseptal emphysema (PS) 600 3245 0.9405 0.9861 0.9630 0.9633
Centrilobular emphysema (CL) 600 3013 0.9220 0.9810 0.9510 0.9515
Avg/Total 4800 34378 0.9041 0.9818 0.9420 0.9430

SN: sensitivity; SP: specificity; GM: geometric mean; BA: balanced accuracy.