Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 15;10:326. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57223-y

Table 3.

Glomerular number (Nglom) and volume (aVglom) for the CKD and control mice kidneys using the proposed UH-DoG method comparing with HDoG method (*aVglom unit mm3 × 10−4).

Mouse Nglom (UH-DoG) Nglom (HDoG) Nglom Difference Ratio (%) Mean aVglom (UH-DoG) Mean aVglom (HDoG) Mean aVglom Difference Ratio (%) Median aVglom (UH-DoG) Median aVglom (HDoG) Median aVglom Difference Ratio (%)
CKD ID 429 7,346 7,656 4.05 2.92 2.57 11.99 1.74 1.48 14.94
ID 466 8,138 8,665 6.08 2.06 2.01 2.43 1.15 0.94 18.26
ID 467 8,663 8,549 1.33 2.32 2.16 6.90 1.47 1.28 12.93
Avg 8,049 8,290 2.91 2.43 2.25 7.67 1.45 1.23 15.14
Std 663 552 0.44 0.29 0.30 0.27
Control ID 427 12,701 12,724 0.18 1.61 1.49 7.45 1.26 1.15 8.73
ID 469 11,347 10,829 4.78 2.20 1.91 13.18 1.41 1.20 14.89
ID 470 11,309 10,704 5.65 2.04 1.98 2.94 1.50 1.37 8.67
ID 471 12,279 11,943 2.81 1.56 1.5 3.85 1.22 1.13 7.38
ID 472 12,526 12,569 0.34 1.49 1.35 9.40 1.16 1.06 8.62
ID 473 11,853 12,245 3.20 1.58 1.50 5.06 1.25 1.18 5.60
Avg 12,003 11,836 1.41 1.75 1.62 7.16 1.30 1.18 9.10
Std 595 872 0.30 0.26 0.13 0.10