Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 3;127(6):1519–1527. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00508.2019

Table 2.

Comparison on the basis of work rate between MMSS and RCP (corrected by MRTSS) and between CP and RCP (corrected by MRTLIN)

Ramp Slope, W/min
5 10 15 25 30
MMSS vs. RCP (corrected by MRTSS)
    Bias, W −3
(−14 to 9)
6*#
(−12 to 25)
16*#
(−4 to 36)
28*#
(9–47)
32*#
(10–55)
    r 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.98
    RMSE, W 6 11 19 29 34
    CCC 0.99
(0.97–1.00)
0.98
(0.92–0.99)
0.94
(0.83–0.98)
0.87
(0.69–0.95)
0.83
(0.62–0.93)
CP versus RCP (corrected by MRTLIN)
    Bias, W −6
(−36 to 23)
−4
(−46 to 39)
10*
(−23 to 43)
29*#
(−7 to 65)
35*#
(0–71)
    r 0.97 0.93 0.96 0.95 0.95
    RMSE, W 16 21 19 34 39
    CCC 0.96
(0.86–0.99)
0.92
(0.75–0.98)
0.94
(0.81–0.98)
0.83
(0.59–0.94)
0.80
(0.54–0.92)

Bias is calculated from the Bland&Altman plot (lower and upper limits of agreement). MMSS, maximal metabolic steady state; RCP, respiratory compensation point; MRT, mean response time of V̇o2 corresponding to the intersection of the two regression lines (LIN) and at steady state (SS); r, Pearson’s coefficient of correlation; RMSE, typical root mean square error between two indexes; CCC, Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval); CP, critical power.

*

Bias is different from 0.

#

Significant difference between MMSS or CP from RCP (P < 0.05).