Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 18;84:e464–e469. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2019.90090

Table 1.

The analysis evaluation results of liver nodules according to the LIRADS reporting system by observers and inter-observer reproducibility levels in LIRADS categories

LIRADS Ob-1 n (%) Ob-2 n (%) Ob-3 n (%) Ob-4 n (%) Ob-5 n (%) Con n (%) k (95% CI)
LR-1 30 (22.73%) 21 (15.91%) 40 (30.30%) 32 (24.24%) 37 (28.03%) 10 (35.71%) 0.522 (0.468-0.575)
LR-2 12 (9.09%) 23 (17.42%) 8 (6.06%) 1 (0.76%) 8 (6.06%) 0 (0%) 0.082 (0.028-0.135)
LR-3 17 (12.88%) 20 (15.15%) 8 (6.06%) 12 (9.09%) 14 (10.61%) 0 (0%) 0.298 (0.244-0.352)
LR-4 15 (11.36%) 11 (8.33%) 13 (9.85%) 24 (18.18%) 9 (6.82%) 0 (0%) 0.143 (0.089-0.197)
LR-5 32 (24.24%) 34 (25.76%) 48 (36.36%) 48 (36.36%) 51 (38.64%) 12 (42.86%) 0.442 (0.388-0.496)
LR-5V 24 (18.18%) 22 (16.67%) 15 (11.36%) 14 (10.61%) 8 (6.06%) 6 (21.43%) 0.600 (0.546-0.654)
LR-M 2 (1.52%) 1 (0.76%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.76%) 5 (3.79%) 0 (0%) 0.268 (0.214-0.322)
Total 132 (100%) 132 (100%) 132 (100%) 132 (100%) 132 (100%) 28 (100%) 0.392 (0.366-0.418)

Ob – observer, κ– Fleiss’s kappa, Con – consensus, n – number of nodules, LR – LIRADS