Table 3.

Negative binomial regression for rostered primary care utilization, comparing patients stably housed and those experiencing homelessness

	Estimate, unadjusted	Estimate, adjusted for physician	Estimate, adjusted for physician and demographics
Total cohort	β 0.82 (95% CI 0.67, 0.95), RR 2.25 (95% CI 1.95, 2.59) p < 0.0001	β 0.77 (95% CI 0.63, 0.91), RR 2.15 (95% CI 1.87, 2.59), p < 0.0001	β 0.70 (0.55, 0.85), RR 2.01 (95% CI 1.73, 2.34)*, p < 0.0001
Females only	β 0.48 (95% CI 0.23, 0.73), RR 1.61 (95% CI 1.26, 2.08), p < 0.0001	β 0.45 (95% CI 0.21, 0.70), RR 1.57 (95% CI 1.23, 2.01), p = 0.0003	β 0.53 (95% CI 0.27, 0.79), RR 1.70 (95% CI 1.31, 2.21)†, p = 0.0004
Males only	β 0.87 (95% CI 0.70, 1.06), RR 2.41 (95% CI 2.00, 2.89), p < 0.0001	β 0.85 (95% CI 0.67, 1.04), RR 2.34 (95% CI 1.95, 2.82), p < 0.0001	β 0.67 (95% CI 0.46, 0.87), RR 1.95 (95% CI 1.59, 2.40)†, p < 0.0001

*Adjusted for continuous age, gender, and physician roster

^†Adjusted for continuous age and physician roster