Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 8;109(4):480–488. doi: 10.17269/s41997-018-0102-1

Table 3.

Predictive performance of TNM stage by edition, including sensitivity analyses

Harrell’s C statistic (95% CI) Akaike information criterion
Sixth edition Seventh edition Sixth edition Seventh edition
Entire cohort (n = 2366)
 TNM stage broad 0.64 (0.63–0.65) 0.68 (0.67–0.69) 27,112 26,861
 TNM stage refined 0.64 (0.63–0.65) 0.68 (0.67–0.69) 27,110 26,843
Excluding unknown stage (n = 2046)
 TNM stage broad 0.64 (0.63–0.65) 0.69 (0.68–0.70) 22,539 22,343
 TNM stage refined 0.64 (0.63–0.65) 0.69 (0.68–0.71) 22,536 22,324
Excluding GEJ tumours (n = 1761)
 TNM stage broad 0.65 (0.64–0.66) 0.69 (0.68–0.70) 18,955 18,777
 TNM stage refined 0.65 (0.64–0.66) 0.69 (0.68–0.71) 18,951 18,763
Surgical resection (n = 944)
 TNM stage broad 0.66 (0.64–0.68) 0.68 (0.66–0.70) 7793 7761
 TNM stage refined 0.66 (0.64–0.69) 0.69 (0.67–0.71) 7789 7746
Non-metastatic (n = 846)
 TNM stage broad 0.72 (0.69–0.74) 0.70 (0.68–0.72) 6741 8006
 TNM stage refined 0.72 (0.70–0.74) 0.72 (0.70–0.74) 6737 7984

TNM tumour, lymph node, metastasis; n sample size; CI confidence intervals