Table 1.
Summary statistics for tobacco policy scores using the School Tobacco Policy Index (STPI) for school boards and secondary schools in Ontario and Alberta, Canada
| Domain 1: tobacco-free environment (/14) | Domain 2: enforcement (/12) | Domain 3: prevention and treatment services (/6) | Domain 4: policy organization (/8) | Overall (/40) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | Min | Max | Median | Min | Max | Median | Min | Max | Median | Min | Max | Median | Min | Max | |
| School board tobacco policy scoresa | |||||||||||||||
| Overall | 9 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 4 | 27 |
| Secondary school tobacco policy scoresb | |||||||||||||||
| Overall | 4 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 23 |
| Urbanicity c | |||||||||||||||
| Rural/small urban (n = 19) | 3 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 20 |
| Medium urban (n = 5) | 4 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 17 |
| Large urban (n = 19) | 8 | 0 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 4 | 23 |
| School-level prevalence of current smokingd | |||||||||||||||
| High (n = 38) | 4 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 9.5 | 3 | 23 |
| Low (n = 5) | 3 | 2 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 4 | 19 |
a21 school boards included; 8 school boards in Alberta, 13 school boards in Ontario
b43 secondary schools included; 6 secondary schools in Alberta, 37 secondary schools in Ontario
cUrbanicity was determined based on school postal codes and Statistics Canada classifications of “rural” area and “small,” “medium,” and “large urban” population centres. “Rural” and “small” population-centre categories were combined due to the low frequency of rural schools
dSchool-level prevalence of current smoking was based on the proportion of all students who reported smoking cigarettes in the last 30 days and 2014/2015 Canadian Student Tobacco, Alcohol and Drugs Survey estimates of past 30-day smoking for Ontario students. Schools were categorized as “low” if the school-level prevalence of smoking was < 5.6% and “high” if the school-level prevalence of smoking was ≥ 5.6%