Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 16;21(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11864-019-0698-2

Table 1.

Summary of recent studies of the accuracy of clinician predictions of survival (June 2015 to June 2019)

Setting Patients Prediction Accuracy defined as Outcome (95% CI, if available)
Temporal predictions
  Amano 2016

16 palliative care units, 19 hospital palliative care teams, 23 home palliative care services

Japan

N = 2036

Locally advanced or metastatic cancer

Specific temporal (for additional analysis also separated into categories < 7 days, 7–13 days, 14–27 days, 28–41 days, 42–55 days, 56–83 days, and 84 days+)

CPS lies between 0.67 and 1.33* times the AS, i.e. error was less than + 33%

Spearman’s correlation coefficient between CPS and AS

- Accurate in 35% (33–37%); overestimated in 45% (43–47%)

- Categories concordant 35%

- Spearman’s correlation coefficient 0.69 reflecting good agreement

  Hui 2016 and Farinholt 2018 Hospital, USA; secondary analysis of study of new prognostic marker

N = 222

Advanced cancer with palliative care consults

Specific temporal C-index. AUC at 30 days and 100 days

- C-index 0.58 (0.47–0.68)

- AUC at 30 days 0.58 (0.47–0.68)

- AUC at 100 days 0.62 (0.54–0.70)

  Urahama 2018^ Hospice, Japan

N = 101

Cancer referred from hospital to hospice for end of life care

Specific temporal CPS lies between 0.67 and 1.33* times the AS, i.e. error was less than + 33% - Accurate in 22.8%; overestimated in 67.3%
  Tavares 2018 Hospital, Portugal

N = 38

Cancer known to the palliative care team (excluded haematological malignancy)

Specific temporal If CPS and actual survival differed by less than 1 week

- Junior doctors accurate in 10.5%

- Palliative care physicians accurate in 23.7%

  Razvi 2018 Hospital, Canada

N = 172

Advanced cancer referred for palliative radiotherapy

Specific temporal (for additional analysis converted to categories ≤12, 13–26, 27–52, > 52 weeks) Mean and median difference between CPS and AS in weeks

- Median difference overestimated by 14 weeks (IQ 1.3–36.4)

- Categories concordant 41%

  Vasista 2019 Secondary analysis of INTEGRATE trial of regorafenib in multiple countries (Australia, New Zealand, Canada, South Korea)

N = 152

Locally recurrent or metastatic gastric or oesophago-gastric cancer progressing after 1 or 2 lines of chemotherapy, ECOG status 0–1

Specific temporal

CPS lies between 0.67 and 1.33* times the AS, i.e. error was less than + 33%

C statistic

- Accurate in 29%

- C-index 0.62 (0.57–0.68)

  Gramling 2019 2 hospitals, USA

N = 230

Metastatic cancer referred for palliative care consultation with a clear comfort only plan (excluded haematological malignancy)

Categorical temporal

(< 24 h, 24 h to < 2 weeks, 2 weeks to < 3 months, 3 months to < 6 months, and > 6 months)

If category selected by physician was concordant with actual survival - Accurate in 41%, overestimate in 50%#
  Simmons 2019 9 regional cancer centres, 7 palliative care units, UK

N = 463

Incurable cancer (excluded breast or prostate cancer with only bone metastasis)

Categorical temporal (≤14 days, 15–56 days, and ≥ 57 days) AUC at 1 and 3 months

- AUC 1 month 0.71 (0.63–0.79)

- AUC at 3 months 0.68 (0.62–0.73)

  Ermacora 2019 2 palliative care units, Italy

N = 334

Advanced cancer with no indications for oncology treatments, KPS 10–50%

Categorical temporal (1–2, 3–4, 5–6, 7–10, 11–12 weeks, or over 12 weeks) AUC at 30 days separated by who made the prediction

- Nurse AUC 0.78 (0.72–0.82)

- Physician 1 AUC 0.77 (0.77–0.81)

- Physician 2 AUC 0.76 (0.71–0.81)

Probabilistic predictions
  Malhotra 2019 Outpatient oncology, USA; secondary analysis of VOICES trial (communication and decision-making intervention)

N = 263

Stage IV non-haematological cancer or stage III plus oncologist would “not be surprised” if the patient died within 12 months

Probabilistic—chances of survival at 2 years with options of 0%, about 10%, about 25%, about 50%, about 75%, about 90%, or 100%

If difference between status at 2 years and prediction − 0.49 to 0.49+

AUC at 2 years

- Accurate predictions 62%

- Pessimistic predictions 26%

- AUC 0.81 (0.75–0.87)

CPS clinician predicted survival, AS actual survival, AUC area under the curve (measure of concordance commonly used to evaluate predictive ability of a model; general agreement a value > 0.7 is acceptable)

*CPS/AS

^Results only from oncologist estimates; the palliative physicians are suggested to use predictive models to prognosticate

#Extrapolated from data provided in paper

+Status at 2 years (alive = 1 and dead = 0) minus prediction (i.e. 0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 0.72, 0.9, or 1)