TABLE 7.

Percentage and number of individuals in late-emerging groups identified with the use of a buffer zone (bz).

Late-emerging groups identified using a single cut-off	Late-emerging groups identified using a buffer zone	Simulation without measurement error, group % (N)	Simulation with measurement error, group % (N)
no RD → RC	no RD → RC	1.69 (24)	2.30 (33)
	no RD → RF(bz) + RC	0.28 (4)	0.42 (6)
	RC(bz) → RC	1.10 (16)	0.98 (14)
	RC(bz) → RF(bz) + RC	0.29 (4)	0.32 (5)
	RF(bz) → RC	0.20 (3)	0.36 (5)
	RF(bz) → RF(bz) + RC	0.28 (4)	0.25 (4)
	RF(bz) + RC(bz) → RC	0.21 (3)	0.24 (3)
	RF(bz) + RC(bz) → RF(bz) + RC	0.33 (5)	0.22 (3)
		4.38 (63)	5.09 (73)
no RD → RF	no RD → RF	0.29 (4)	0.85 (12)
	no RD → RF + RC(bz)	0.09 (1)	0.22 (3)
	RC(bz) → RF	0.09 (1)	0.26 (4)
	RC(bz) → RF + RC(bz)	0.06 (1)	0.12 (2)
	RF(bz) → RF	0.82 (12)	0.92 (13)
	RF(bz) → RF + RC(bz)	0.26 (4)	0.31 (5)
	RF(bz) + RC(bz) → RF	0.37 (5)	0.37 (5)
	RF(bz) + RC(bz) → RF + RC(bz)	0.25 (4)	0.20 (3)
		2.23 (32)	3.25 (47)
no RD → RF + RC	no RD → RF + RC	0.04 (0)	0.13 (2)
	RC(bz) → RF + RC	0.06 (1)	0.11 (1)
	RF(bz) → RF + RC	0.14 (2)	0.18 (3)
	RF(bz) + RC(bz) → RF + RC	0.20 (3)	0.18 (3)
		0.44 (6)	0.60 (9)

The number in parentheses shows the number of individuals based on the percentage for N = 1,432. The bold values show the total number of late-emerging cases.