TABLE 8.

Percentages and number of individuals of the resolving groups identified with the use of a buffer zone.

Resolving groups identified using a single cut-off	Resolving groups identified using a buffer zone	Simulation without measurement error (ME), group % (N)	Simulation with ME, group % (N)
RC → no RD	RC → no RD	1.04 (15)	1.65 (24)
	RC → RC(bz)	0.77 (11)	0.82 (12)
	RC → RF(bz)	0.25 (4)	0.41 (6)
	RC → RF(bz) + RC(bz)	0.25 (4)	0.26 (4)
	RF(bz) + RC → no RD	0.27 (4)	0.42 (6)
	RF(bz) + RC → RC(bz)	0.21 (3)	0.24 (3)
	RF(bz) + RC → RF(bz)	0.35 (5)	0.36 (5)
	RF(bz) + RC → RF(bz) + RC(bz)	0.35 (5)	0.22 (3)
		3.49 (50)	4.38 (63)
RF → no RD	RF → no RD	0.39 (6)	0.93 (13)
	RF → RC(bz)	0.07 (1)	0.19 (3)
	RF → RF(bz)	0.97 (14)	1.06 (15)
	RF → RF(bz) + RC(bz)	0.24 (3)	0.26 (4)
	RF + RC(bz) → no RD	0.11 (2)	0.26 (4)
	RF + RC(bz) → RC(bz)	0.06 (1)	0.11 (2)
	RF + RC(bz) → RF(bz)	0.41 (6)	0.42 (6)
	RF + RC(bz) → RF(bz) + RC(bz)	0.22 (3)	0.19 (3)
		2.47 (36)	3.42 (49)
RF + RC → no RD	RF + RC → no RD	0.05 (1)	0.15 (2)
	RF + RC → RC(bz)	0.04 (1)	0.10 (1)
	RF + RC → RF(bz)	0.22 (3)	0.28 (4)
	RF + RC → RF(bz) + RC(bz)	0.21 (3)	0.20 (3)
		0.52 (8)	0.73 (10)

The number in parentheses shows the number of individuals based on the percentage for N = 1,432. The bold values show the total number of resolving cases.