Table 1.
Predicted protein-coding scores for the four candidates using different tools.
| Sets | C vs. T (U) | C vs. T (U) | C vs. T (D) | C vs. T (D) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Differentially expressed lncRNAs | LINC01087 | lnc-CLSTN2-1:1 | lnc-c7orf65–3:3 | LINC01559:2 |
| Length (bp) | 3516 | 5692 | 609 | 1003 |
| PhyloCSF score | 25.7357 | −56.324 | −44.4845 | – |
| CPAT coding probability | 0.48% | 2.19% | 5.28% | 0.63% |
| Bazzini small ORFs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Locus conservation | No | Yes | No | No |
| No | No | No | No | |
| R and fold minimum free energy | −917.46 | −188 | −177.8 | −789.43 |
| R and fold P-value | 0.016 | 0.073 | 0.078 | 0.045 |
| Targeting miRNAs | hsa-miR-548n, hsa-miR-548as-5p, hsa-miR-548as-5p | – | – | – |
C=Control, T = Treated, U=Up-regulated, D = Down-regulated.