Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 10;176(24):4653–4665. doi: 10.1111/bph.14829

Table 1.

Efficacy and functional affinity of CP55940, ∆9‐THC, and other SCRAs

Compound Operational efficacy τ Functional affinity pK A (±SEM)
Control (±SEM) AM6544‐treated (±SEM)
CP55940 72 (30) 7 (3) 5.78 (0.09)
WIN55212‐2 57 (41) 3 (1) 4.84 (0.24)
9‐THC 0.9 (0.1) 0.3 (0.1) 6.54 (0.07)
2‐AG 60 (27) 3 (1) 5.16 (0.08)
AEA 5 (2) 2 (2) 5.17 (0.10)
JWH‐018 43 (21) 2.5 (1) 5.72 (0.21)
AM‐2201 32 (6) 2 (0.4) 6.53 (0.08)
UR‐144 36 (7) 3 (0.5) 4.51 (0.15)
XLR‐11 152 (73) 13 (9) 4.68 (0.26)
PB‐22 44 (10) 3.2 (1) 6.73 (0.10)
5F‐PB‐22 102 (48) 7 (5) 7.05 (0.09)
AB‐CHMINACA 92 (42) 4 (1) 6.98 (0.12)
AB‐PINACA 28 (7) 2 (0.4) 6.90 (0.21)
MDMB‐CHMICA 79 (32) 8 (4) 6.35 (0.17)
MDMB‐FUBINACA 103 (62) 5 (1.4) 7.12 (0.10)
5F‐MDMB‐PICA 233 (65) 14 (3) 6.71 (0.13)
CUMYL‐4CN‐BINACA 70 (28) 4 (1) 7.48 (0.07)

Note. Values were calculated using the operational model of pharmacological agonism following CB1 receptor depletion with AM6544, as outlined in Section 2.